![]() |
| Social Media vs Traditional Media. |
The year is 2014; we have smartphones, laptops, tablets and coffee machines controlled by smartphones. News is easily available so we constantly informed and given the information we need to suit our lifestyles and personalities. We constantly connected even while we sleeping. Now the problem with all of this technological and digital innovation is that traditional methods of communication suffer, forcing media professional’s to rethink and restructure operation processes. According to strategist and communications consultant, Ulaysha Sukhu, professionals have coped with the ever-changing digital media platforms and even, newsroom cutbacks but for most there is a want to thrive on these changes.
News has always been free; newspapers were sold not for the news stories but rather for the features that journalists had written. Currently media houses are faced with the challenge of declining advertising and circulation that is rapidly declining. It would be foolish, to expect people to pay for a service, they have received for free for years.
Does the traditional journalist have a place in the social era? No, the traditional journalist does not have a place in a Social and digital world, but an innovative journalist does!
To be an innovative journalist, one would need to forget all that they know about traditional media platforms, expect for a few vital points. The first is that content is king; whether your publication is digital or print, an audience chose you for your content. Editorial integrity ensures quality assurance. Strategic advisor to the Daily Mail, Bill Raduchel says, that quality assurance is what will successfully move a print company into the digital age without too much disruption if it is done well. The quality of the stories should not deteriorate; readers trust the brand to stay the same through this period of disruption. The second is a cliché but people still believe what they read! Digital and social platforms are too easily accessible; people look to print for credibility. According to Head of Operations at FT.com and Financial Times associate Editor, Lisa MacLeod, the Financial Times breaks major stories on print before digital because readers identify more with the story if put on paper before it is put on the web. With that said, journalists have always played a vital role in society, journalists speak for those who cannot speak and importantly are watchdogs for the government and as well as create public opinion on many social matters.
Media houses in South Africa will survive the digital and social media disruption but no media house will function the same way it did 25 or even five years ago.

Thank you for this informative and enlightening article :)
ReplyDeletePleasure :)
DeleteBIG ups to Social Media!!
ReplyDeleteSocial Media All Day Every Day :)
Deletetraditional media has a limited reach in todays world, however not "DEAD", digital media is the new age and journalists are riding this train so not to be left behind
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Siya...traditional media is just a cherry on top.
DeleteBut for me I still see the need of traditional media even though social me is the in thing,journalists just have to use social media to their advantage
ReplyDeleteI disagree because social media is trending in today's world. A lot of companies have accounts in social media channels to try and promote their service or product because they realized that traditional media is no longer working to their advantage.
DeleteTraditional media was the only option people had back in the days and it was limited, social media is broad not only media professionals need it but we also do .It is an advantage to all of us.
ReplyDeleteI also prefer social media because you are even able to have immediately impact unlike traditional media which has a delayed impact in today's world.
Deleteyour article says it all, social media has taken over traditional media. As I prefer social media than traditional media because it is easy to access information through it.
ReplyDeleteTrue...social media has taken over in the 21st century, it is more convenient than traditional media because traditional media is old fashioned.
DeleteSocial Media have taken over but traditional media is still preferred
ReplyDelete